How to write literary essay
Essays For Northanger Abbey Essay Topics
Sunday, August 23, 2020
Organization Development Survey Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words
Association Development Survey - Essay Example The upsides of study polls are examined below:Standardized Way:The information assortment goes in a normalized manner, so the surveys are exceptionally favored when contrasted with some other information assortment method.The inquiries in polls are progressively explicit and keeping in mind that they are readied, the goal of leading the review is being remembered, so the inquiries help in accomplishing the objective.Relatively Fast Method of Collection of Data:This is the generally quick strategy to gather the information in overview; in any case, it might take long to get ready and break down. It needs a great deal of time and exertion to plan polls, to investigate the surveys, to make the particular inquiries with the goal that the article is accomplished, yet at that point, toward the end, it requires least an ideal opportunity to lead it. In correlation with different strategies, information assortment in overview polls is generally fast.High Rate of Returns:The return paces of s urveys review are high. Polls are anything but difficult to reply. It takes at least five minutes to fill the entire poll. Thus, individuals for the most part don't contend in filling polls. Different strategies, for example, interviews take a ton of time of the respondents, so individuals as a rule contend on it. Overview surveys can without much of a stretch be dispersed to countless crowds. It empowers to accumulate various points.The polls spread pretty much all aspects of research not at all like meetings. Polls are planned in a manner so every perspective is covered.... Different techniques, for example, interviews take a ton of time of the respondents, so individuals for the most part contend on it. Overview surveys can undoubtedly be conveyed to countless crowds. It empowers to accumulate various purpose of perspectives (Zikmund and Babin, 2009, p. 7). Covers each Aspect: The surveys spread pretty much all aspects of research dissimilar to interviews. Polls are structured in a manner with the goal that each viewpoint is secured. It comprises of precise inquiries of which it requires exact answers. It can have numerous inquiries to cover each part of the separate theme. Leads in the Formation of Theories: Many of the positivists ââ¬Å"believe that quantitative information can be utilized to make new speculations and/or test existing hypothesesâ⬠(Koneru, 2008, pp. 218ââ¬220). The polls empower to assemble quantitative information. It permits the respondent to offer direct responses, for example truly or no, which makes the information exact . These precise information lead to the arrangement of speculations or existing theory. Financially savvy One of the primary advantages of overview poll is that it doesn't require a high pace of venture. The cost engaged with conveying the polls is unimportant as contrasted and different techniques for information assortment (Koneru, 2008, p. 221). Impediments Truthfulness: It is elusive out honesty of respondents in a poll review. Typically respondents fill the polls haphazardly, so legitimate sentiments and precise data are not assembled. This is a major downside of polls since this can antagonistically influence the consequence of the review and along these lines, inappropriate expectations will be made. Confusion: There is a likelihood that the respondent may decipher the inquiries in an alternate manner. This distinction in the translation
Saturday, August 22, 2020
The Seven Habits Of Highly Effective People Essay Example for Free
The Seven Habits Of Highly Effective People Essay A few people call The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People, by Stephen Covey, one of the most significant self improvement guides written in the previous twenty years. Others state it is a standout amongst other business books composed ongoing history. Whether or not it is known as a self improvement guide or a business book, it has been a fiercely famous and productive distribution. Seven Habits has sold more than fifteen million duplicates and has been on different smash hit records ceaselessly since its distribution in 1989. Without a doubt, Coveys blockbuster book burned through five back to back years, 1991-1995, as Americas top true to life smash hit. Bunch has profoundly held strict convictions. He is an individual from the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, all the more usually known as the Mormons, which is reflected in his compositions. There is a solid Judeo-Christian hard working attitude embraced and the idea of an individual assuming individual liability for their very own turn of events, and the seven propensities he alludes to in this book bear a solid association with the Mormon Churchs thirteen major convictions. Bunch accepts these seven propensities for profoundly compelling individuals can be scholarly and, on the other hand, old propensities that advance insufficiency can be unlearned. A significant issue in learning and receiving the seven propensities for profoundly compelling individuals, Covey opines in Seven Habits, is one of outlook changing. A worldview is characterized as a fundamental mental system that firmly impacts a people thoughts, convictions and, in this way, activities. An individual has standards about everything throughout everyday life: what makes a decent marriage, what is a decent school, what is worthy social conduct, and on infinitum. Until an individual can move from one perspective on issue, or circumstance, to another, the person in question will be secured in old ideal models that can limit new understandings and development. Moving the United States Coast Guard from the Department of Transportation to the recently shaped Department of Homeland Security will require certain government specialists to play out a change in outlook from how they recently saw the job and capacity of the USCG to another perspective. Ongoing perspectives on mak e firmness in endeavors at critical thinking, the executives, and administration. Flock partitions his seven propensities for exceptionally powerful individuals into three interrelated classes; the first are propensities for character, the second are propensities for outward articulation that lead to association with others, and the keep going propensity concentrating on supporting the development procedure. This division turns out to be clear when he records his propensities. Propensities for Independence: * Habit #1. Be proactive. Flock composes it is dependent upon the person to hold onto the activity to utilize their assets to progress in the direction of objectives. He discusses a hover of impact and a hover of concern and proposes that agonizing over things past your hover of impact isn't beneficial, however working inside your hover of impact is the most ideal approach to amplify your adequacy. * Habit #2. Start With The End In Mind. Flock shows this propensity with a fairly chilling inquiry: What do you need individuals to state about you at your burial service? He at that point includes that you can help your advancement toward accomplishing your objectives in the event that you practice representation, so when you at last endeavor an errand, you will have just done it on many occasions in your creative mind. This is a strategy mentors have shown free toss shooters to rehearse for quite a long time; picture your position, your pre-shot customs lastly envision the ball going neatly through the net. Bunch composes, We might be occupied, we might be proficient, however we will likewise be really successful when we start in view of the end. * Habit #3. Put First Things First. This is a period the board propensity and Covey sums up what he implies by composing, Organize and execute around needs. He builds up a grid where he partitions all exercises in four classifications: In Quadrant I are things that are significant and pressing. In Quadrant II are things that are significant, yet not critical. In Quadrant III are things that are earnest, yet not significant. Lastly, In Quadrant IV are things that at not significant and not dire. Propensity #3, including Coveys framework about time the board, is the Golden Nugget of this book. Group expresses that effective individuals keep a large portion of their exercises in Quadrant II since they can design and get ready for future exercises. Those individuals who continually discover their exercises in Quadrant I will in the end copy out with over the top anxiety since they are in a constant emergency mode. Those people who discover a large portion of their exercises in Quadrants III and IV are regularly crazy and dependant on others or organizations to assist them with living their lives. Group accepts that the term time the board is really a misnomer; that is, the test isn't the manner by which to oversee time, yet rather how to oversee ourselves. One of the focal subjects of the book is finding the right P/PC balance. In the event that we can't oversee ourselves, and our time, we will always be unable to keep up appropriate Production. The P alludes to creation and the PC alludes to creation ability. He outlines this P/PC division by utilizing a machine as a representation. In the event that you ruin a machine twenty-four hours every day, seven days per week, fifty fourteen days per year you will get extraordinary creation at first, yet inevitably that machine will separate and be demolished or need fix. Assuming, in any case, you run the machine on a normally planned support premise, you may not accomplish a similar creation numbers as a machine being persistently utilized, however it won't endure significant breakdowns and as time goes on the creation will be more noteworthy. Propensities for Interdependence. * Habit #4. Think Win-Win. This is a propensity that urges you to look for arrangements of shared advantage to all gatherings worried, instead of win-lose circumstances where one individual successes and the other individual loses. Brood outlines this propensity by affirming that an amazing programming operator from the get-go in life is athletic rivalry where understudies build up a fundamental worldview that life is a lose-lose situation; that is, on the off chance that somebody wins, somebody must lose. To be really fruitful, Covey composes, an individual has to realize how to use the qualities of others and that is done not by making win/lose circumstances, yet rather looking to make win/win circumstances. To be sure, he feels no arrangement is better than a non-win-win bargain. * Habit #5. Look for First To Understand, Then To Be Understood. This is a correspondence propensity that centers around empathic listening aptitudes. He asks how might you make win/win circumstances in the event that you don't tune in to the next individual? Doctors analyze before they endorse. Top salesmen find the customers needs before they offer an answer. Moreover, people need to practice sympathy; they should try to initially comprehend different people perspective before offering their own answers * Habit #6. Synergize. Flock characterizes collaboration as significance the entire is more prominent than the aggregate of its parts. He accepts we have to esteem the contrasts among individuals and how they see the world and understand their standards probably won't be our ideal models, however they are similarly substantial for them. When an individual acknowledges the legitimacy of looking for win-win arrangement, the propensity for synergize or looking for helpful collaboration gets evident. Cooperative energy comes about because of esteeming contrasts and by uniting those distinctions in the soul of common regard. * Habit #7. Hone The Saw. In self-recharging, Covey refers to four aspects of our life that require consistent consideration: physical, mental, enthusiastic social and otherworldly. He composed that individuals get too caught up with delivering or sawing and infrequently set aside the effort to stop and hone their saw or those four parts of their lives. In the event that they would set aside the effort to stop and hone, the time they lost honing would be more than repaid by expanded creation. The model refered to represent this point is one of hardware. On the off chance that a machine runs max speed 24 hours per day for seven days per week, fifty fourteen days every year, without time being saved for support, it will before long break under the anxiety. Assuming nonetheless, that equivalent machine has a standard support plan, it could work inconclusively. Brood recognizes something he calls the Character Ethic from the Personality Ethic. He trusts Americans have moved away from grasping character morals, or wide suffering lasting qualities, for example, trustworthiness, faithfulness and even the Ten Commandments, and turned towards Personality Ethics, where the accentuation is currently on such things as how to dress for progress, one-minute arrangements and handy solutions. He feels the more up to date accentuation on character centers consideration around momentary arrangements while the quality related with the Character Ethic advances more beneficial good long haul arrangements. This was my preferred piece of the book since America really has moved away from a Kantian good absolutism perspective and has cultivated to a greater extent an ethical relativism approach. Seven Habits Of Highly Effective People is a book that can't be perused one time and be completely comprehended. Each propensity contains so much data and shrewdness that it is for all intents and purposes difficult to disguise what Covey is stating without perusing and rehashing each area. It is difficult to refer to one thing as the most significant as identified with initiative since they are between related. The one idea clarified in this book had the best effect on my life, until this point, was Coveys conversation of time the board. In secondary school, when my dad initially acquainted me with this book, I was fairly confused and to some degree disorderly in requesting my needs. In spite of the fact that I had never understood it, my dad clarified portions of the book all around ok with the goal that I could profit by a portion of its information. I unmistakably recollect occupying out the time grid diagram presented in Habit 3 and finding the greater part of my exercises fell into Quadrant I. It was clear I was not arranging my demonstration
Friday, August 21, 2020
Are social networks a positive phenomenon Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words
Are interpersonal organizations a constructive marvel - Essay Example While considering the idea of long range interpersonal communication as a marvel or enduring component of culture, one must consider the methods by which systems administration has just had a critical effect inside society. In such matters, maybe the most significant or important can be found inside the field of training. Inside training person to person communication has grabbed hold in numerous study hall situations through imaginative learning arrangements. One such model is that of the systems administration gadget Ning. Educators all through the nation have had the option to execute Ning to propel homeroom venture coordinated effort in practical and creative manners. For example, one such strategy for collective handling has been appeared to happen in English study halls when the teacher can allot schoolwork to understudies through this informing framework, permitting them to cooperatively conceptualize ventures, and to look for exhortation from one another on testing sections a nd gathering ventures (Fraser and Dutta, 2008). While such collective reasoning was recently consigned to the homeroom condition it is currently ready to be persisted to schoolwork circumstances. This has extended the scholarly reaches of the homeroom and made long range informal communication a basic part of this procedure (Dede, 2005). ... In such matters one should just think about how as a stage, for example, Facebook has carried people into contact with one another all through the country and world. While just 10 years back quick social correspondence with people in another nation must be directed through email or phone, Facebook and Twitter permit people to stay in contact with one another through backhanded at this point solid and significant methods. This not just establishes a methods for conveying that is comparable to the recently referenced methods for correspondence, yet works as a completely one of a kind type of socialization. Through these person to person communication stages people can promptly meet individuals through the world and impart not just through verbal discourse, however take part in self-articulation through pictures and tunes. This methods for correspondence takes into consideration newly discovered methods for cooperation and articulation that goes past types of social correspondence, prop elling information on the world through improved coordinated effort. Maybe the most squeezing question of long range informal communication isn't whether it will be viewed as a marvel, yet in what structures it will develop. As has been shown person to person communication is an indispensable component of contemporary culture and not just a pattern, yet it is additionally certain that systems administration is continually developing. At the point when one thinks about that past types of systems administration correspondence as epitomized in MySpace and Friendster immediately offered out to the more useful Facebook, it should not shock anyone that interpersonal interaction as a strong conclusive part of culture must advance into a type of correspondence that is much further developed than flow organizing
Children and Prejudice Essay
Conceptual Over the only remaining century, scientists have been discussing whether biases are innate in youngsters, analysts at that point found that kids are in reality partial, yet banter emerges about how they become preferential. A few investigations proposed that youngsters are brought into the world with being preferential and that it is intrinsic and normal, where as different examinations contend that bias conduct are found out socially off guardians, family, peers and the social condition in which they experienced childhood in. Hypotheses have been contrived to help clarify the bias procedures of kids by in-gathering and out-bunch conduct; there is the Developmental Intergroup Theory and the Social Identity Developmental hypothesis. Another discussion has been surfacing about the lessening of partiality at seven years old and no abatement of bias. One Australian investigation shows consistency with offspring of American and Canada, yet a few examinations show no racial partiality towards different races in kids. Kids and Prejudice. Question of whether youngsters are preferential has for some time been discussed. Past and ongoing investigates have discovered that there are in actuality bias inclinations in kids and that it very well may be available at three years old to four years, yet it is hazy how kids become preferential. Meaning of bias as indicated by Allport (1954) is that preference is ââ¬Å"thinking sick of others without adequate warrantâ⬠(As refered to in Eagly, xxxx, p. 45) and as per Kosslyn and Rosenberg (2004) bias is ââ¬Å"an disposition (by and large negative) toward individuals from a groupâ⬠(p.G-7). Throughout look into on the preference of youngsters, there has been banter over the ââ¬Å"relative job of insight versus ecological learning factorsâ⬠¦Ã¢â¬ (Gutman and Hickson, 1996, p. 448). A few speculations have attempted to clarify the bias in youngsters, for instance, the Developmental Intergroup Theory (Bigler and Liben, 1996) and the Social Identity Development Theory (Nesdale, Durkin, Maass and Griffiths, 2005). A few measures have been utilized to gauge racial mentalities of kids towards different races, for example, the Preschool Racial Attitudes Measure and the Multiresponse Racial Attitude measure (Aboud, 2003). Less then 50 years prior, some social scholars accepted that partiality are inalienable in individuals and that it is inborn and instinctual, it was viewed as normal dislike individuals who contrast genuinely and like individuals who are simply the like one; yet inquire about over the most recent three decades they have disposed of those hypotheses. Analysts are currently persuaded that kids are preferential by learning it socially, kids watch, and are impacted by the ââ¬Å"existence of examples in the way of life in which they liveâ⬠(Clark, 1955, p.17). This being, kids accepted not to be brought into the world with propensities to be preferential however learn it socially by how they live. Reliable with Clark, Bigler and Liben (2007), accepts that small kids are regularly observed as being unaffected by the negative inclinations of grown-ups, yet numerous examinations show that preference exist by the age of four years of age. Allport (1958) states that kids begin to see physical qualities that mark a racial gathering participation. Like investigates above, discoveries of Kowalskiââ¬â¢s (2003) explore, they have discovered that youngsters as youthful as preschoolers begin to have negative mentalities to other racial/out ââ¬Ë gatherings, they tend to say positive articulations regarding same race and negative explanations about different races (Aboud, 1987; Aboud and Sherry, 1984, as refered to in Kowalski, 2003). Until as of late, there were contrasts of supposition concerning the age at which kids begin to create and communicate racial partialities. As per an ongoing examination of white kindergarten kids and African-American youngsters, they show an inclination for skin shading. These youngsters were posed a couple of inquiries and they demonstrated an incredible attention to skin shading, this discovering bolsters that racial mindfulness is available as youthful as the age of three (Clark,1970). A few kids as youthful as three years if age starts to communicate start to communicate racial and strict mentalities like those held by grown-ups in their general public. The racial and strict perspectives of 6th graders are scarcely not the same as the mentalities of secondary school understudies. There is general understanding that youngsters can be preferential, yet what factors there is, is indistinct. It is bantered between natural learning and comprehension improvement. Research on perception advancement has a go at clarifying bias at various periods of intellectual turn of events and the Environmental-learning clarifies that youngsters and segregation isn't established in the kid yet it is found out through a social setting. As per Allport (1988), youngsters are partial since kids ââ¬Å"filter and misshape ecological inputâ⬠, this implies kids are preferential because of the absence of subjective limit at a particular age and that kids have juvenile considerations (As refered to in Gutman and Hickson, 1996, p. 448). From the Social/Environmental Learning hypothesis viewpoint, racial thoughts of youngsters are not solid, all the more handily changed, than racial thoughts of grown-ups. It is plausible; as well, that racial perspectives and conduct are found out off grown-ups. The racial and strict perspectives of a little youngster may turn out to be increasingly positive or progressively negative as he/she develops, as per the social condition of the kid. The heading these mentalities will take type of articulation, will be dictated by the sort of encounters that the kid has experienced childhood in (Clark, 1970). In accordance with Clark (1970), a few specialists propose that youngsters self relate to guardians and learn off them (Sinclair, Dun and Lowery, 2004). Social Learning Theory contends that youngsters create convictions and practices by emulating off a significant model in their life, typically family and companions (Bandura, 1997, as refered to in Sinclair, Dunn and Lowery, 2004). Moreover, connection hypothesis recommends that kids disguise their parentsââ¬â¢ desires. Sinclair et al (2004) look into gave proof that parentsââ¬â¢ racial perspectives does in actuality impact both their childrenââ¬â¢s verifiable and unequivocal racial preference, additionally their outcomes recommend that youngsters that relate to guardians receive the racial mentalities of their folks more on a certain than express level. Truth be told parentsââ¬â¢ understood racial mentalities may affect youngsters than their express racial perspectives since guardians are uninformed of verifiable inclinations, it is oblivious and in this way, incapable to deliberately prevent themselves from demonstrating preference mentalities. This exploration additionally recommends that, parentsââ¬â¢ racial mentalities might be especially persuasive right off the bat in youth, however peers and other type of social natural perspectives can impact kids more as they get more established. A few scientists propose that the impact of ecological learning factors, notwithstanding subjective components, be given increasingly genuine research thought. This would mean, for instance, considering the way that based on their varying presentation to assemble data, kids structure diverse schemata (intellectual structures containing data about gatherings e. g. , Bem, 1981). As indicated by Bergen ( ) family influences the improvement of partiality in kids through demonstrating, which kids watches and emulates significant good examples, Children around seven to nine years old can show preference conduct without a model, and where as more youthful youngsters don't get rules, there fore they see grown-up models (Bergen,), additionally when kids receive their folks biases they genuinely develop with their folks different preferences. Bergen ( ) reasoned that a partial youngster experiences a few phases, for example, dread of outsiders, racial mindfulness, ID with in-gathering, recognizable proof with parentââ¬â¢s feeling and complete dismissals of out-gathering, and seen later on this is like the Social Identity Developmental Theory phaseââ¬â¢s. Scientists accept that the Social Learning Theory is debilitating; specialists are currently going to the fundamental subjective procedures of a childââ¬â¢s preference conduct (Aboud and Sherry, 1984; Bigler &Liben, 1993). Likewise, Bigler and Liben (2007) recommend that Social Learning hypothesis doesn't clarify bias in youngsters, Social Learning Theory is expressing that human conduct isn't intrinsic however learnt through significant/fitting models (Vaughan and Hogg, 2008) . A gathering standard investigation utilized the Social character formative hypothesis, which has four stages. The first is undifferentiated (a few years old) trailed by ethnic mindfulness (ethnic mindfulness starts at three years of age off marking from guardians), and afterward ethnic inclination (the kid discovers that the individual is separated of a social gathering) and afterward ethnic preference (kids around the age of seven has solidified mentalities towards specific races, yet other research recommend that at this age partiality diminishes) (Nesdale et al, 2005; Nesdale, 2004). In this examination, the discoveries were predictable with the Social Identity-Developmental Theory Childrenââ¬â¢s partiality stages, they found that multi year old predispositions of out-bunches are distinctive to those of a more youthful age and is progressively steady; Nesdale et al (2005) recommends that kids at this age ought to be a the solid operational stage, which permits them to have increasingly stable reasoning and solidified. Preferences towards particular kind of individuals are not known why, youngsters just notification certain prompts, for instance, sexual orientation rather then a disabled individual. Research demonstrates that little youngsters will in general spotlight on perceptually exceptional qualities in an individual (perceptional signs being race, sexual orientation, age and engaging quality, and so on). Youngsters watch the attributes of physical appearance. They notice perceptual likenesses and contrasts among the individuals who live, work and mingle together. They at that point accumulate the social gathering
Sunday, July 5, 2020
Comparative Politics Research Paper - 1100 Words
Comparative Politics (Research Paper Sample) Content: Name:Instructorà ¢Ã¢â ¬s name:Course:Date:Comparative PoliticsDescribed as one of the subsidiaries of political science, comparative politics focuses more on the empirical questions in political science s opposed to the other sub-branches of political science that include political theory and international relations. According to Caramamai(2008 2), comparative politics is based not on whether there was participation in the larger field of political science but rather; what type of participation was there and the criteria used to choose the kind of participation that individuals undertake. However, the use of normative questions in comparative politics cannot be ruled out completely. Comparative political scientists sometimes use normative questions despite the fact that the analysis is mostly empirical and value-neutral. International relations which is the other sub-group of political science mainly focuses on war, trade and the balance of power between nations.In comparison to international relations, "comparative politics creates or rather is more specific based on what is being analyzed be it war, trade or balance of power between countries" (3). A practical example of such a scenario is whereby instead of analyzing supremacy battles within and across different countries, comparative politics investigate parties that are within government and those in the opposition and the hard-line positions taken by either of the opposing groups regarding the use of diplomacy or military intervention during crisis. From this explanation, comparative politics is seen to focus more on internal structures within a system of governance. Despite this, the comparison is not limited to inter-relationship between two opposite side but also recognizes the effects of external influences on power shifts within system of governance. In overall, comparative politics is seen as a discipline necessitated by scholars such as Aristotle and Machiavelli in their quest to find out how politics work.Various types of comparative politics that are distinct try to answer the empirical question à ¢Ã¢â ¬ÃÅ"how does science work? 1 The first tradition in relation to the scientific study of politics has the orientation of single country analysis. This in general implies that comparative analysis within a system of governance is done in isolation and with little comparison involved with alternate system. 2 The other tradition of comparative politics takes a methodological approach where the standard procedure for comparative analysis are analyzed. This tradition is more concerned with how comparative politics should be carried out, the standard procedures to be followed as well as the key variables to be used. 3 The third tradition of comparative politics is both methodological and empirical. This tradition is mainly concerned with similarities, differences, and systemic processes between governments, institutions and individuals in an attempt to identif y and explain any differences or similarities.For political science to be considered as part of science, there are several conditions that have to be satisfied owing to the fact that the traditional construct of political science has a lot of generalization. Science too has its own generalization but the scientific aspect of bias and generalization is genuine law generalization. How then does one distinguish this form of generalization to the common de-facto generalization common in life sciences and history? There is a law in natural science that dictates that any generalization does not become genuine law generalization simply because of the inexistence of a counter-argument. In addition to this, a body of theory coming along with any generalization is more inclined to strengthen any argument present even in the inexistence of a counter-argument.Most scholars are of the view that comparative politics has a lot of generalization that may weigh down on comparative politics becoming a natural science. A practical example of this is the assumption that in a two party electoral process, neither of the party is ever interested in winning the support of the other partyà ¢Ã¢â ¬s extremist voters. This is simply because each of the party will try and rally support from individuals who share similar ideologies as those generated by the party of support. The area of interest would therefore be to rally support from an opposing side but specifically target the undecided and somehow sympathizers from an opposing side.For comparative politics to be considered as a natural science there must be a well defined discipline of comparative history going by the background of comparative politics that is based on history. However, there are arguments that comparative history has not been able to yield much over the years thus the fundamental question remains; how do we get comparative history to yield.In research design, "case selection process is one of the most fundamental processes that one has to undertake" (52). This is not different in comparative politics. However, there is always a range of options that one can choose to undertake depending on the number of variables and the cases involved. Case selection is very central when it comes to research design and the level of inquiry is predominantly dependent on the empirical question being analyzed. More importantly, the difference in the number of variables and the number of cases is a fundamental option when selecting cases as well as organizing data sets. There are times when the numbers of cases are few a situations that greatly affects the research design chosen. There are five options that are considered during case selections. These key factors include 1 Case study 2 Time series 3 Closed universe 4 Cross section 5 Pooled analysisThe case study method is particularly pivotal in the anal... Comparative Politics Research Paper - 1100 Words Comparative Politics (Research Paper Sample) Content: Name:Instructorà ¢Ã¢â ¬s name:Course:Date:Comparative PoliticsDescribed as one of the subsidiaries of political science, comparative politics focuses more on the empirical questions in political science s opposed to the other sub-branches of political science that include political theory and international relations. According to Caramamai(2008 2), comparative politics is based not on whether there was participation in the larger field of political science but rather; what type of participation was there and the criteria used to choose the kind of participation that individuals undertake. However, the use of normative questions in comparative politics cannot be ruled out completely. Comparative political scientists sometimes use normative questions despite the fact that the analysis is mostly empirical and value-neutral. International relations which is the other sub-group of political science mainly focuses on war, trade and the balance of power between nations.In comparison to international relations, "comparative politics creates or rather is more specific based on what is being analyzed be it war, trade or balance of power between countries" (3). A practical example of such a scenario is whereby instead of analyzing supremacy battles within and across different countries, comparative politics investigate parties that are within government and those in the opposition and the hard-line positions taken by either of the opposing groups regarding the use of diplomacy or military intervention during crisis. From this explanation, comparative politics is seen to focus more on internal structures within a system of governance. Despite this, the comparison is not limited to inter-relationship between two opposite side but also recognizes the effects of external influences on power shifts within system of governance. In overall, comparative politics is seen as a discipline necessitated by scholars such as Aristotle and Machiavelli in their quest to find out how politics work.Various types of comparative politics that are distinct try to answer the empirical question à ¢Ã¢â ¬ÃÅ"how does science work? 1 The first tradition in relation to the scientific study of politics has the orientation of single country analysis. This in general implies that comparative analysis within a system of governance is done in isolation and with little comparison involved with alternate system. 2 The other tradition of comparative politics takes a methodological approach where the standard procedure for comparative analysis are analyzed. This tradition is more concerned with how comparative politics should be carried out, the standard procedures to be followed as well as the key variables to be used. 3 The third tradition of comparative politics is both methodological and empirical. This tradition is mainly concerned with similarities, differences, and systemic processes between governments, institutions and individuals in an attempt to identif y and explain any differences or similarities.For political science to be considered as part of science, there are several conditions that have to be satisfied owing to the fact that the traditional construct of political science has a lot of generalization. Science too has its own generalization but the scientific aspect of bias and generalization is genuine law generalization. How then does one distinguish this form of generalization to the common de-facto generalization common in life sciences and history? There is a law in natural science that dictates that any generalization does not become genuine law generalization simply because of the inexistence of a counter-argument. In addition to this, a body of theory coming along with any generalization is more inclined to strengthen any argument present even in the inexistence of a counter-argument.Most scholars are of the view that comparative politics has a lot of generalization that may weigh down on comparative politics becoming a natural science. A practical example of this is the assumption that in a two party electoral process, neither of the party is ever interested in winning the support of the other partyà ¢Ã¢â ¬s extremist voters. This is simply because each of the party will try and rally support from individuals who share similar ideologies as those generated by the party of support. The area of interest would therefore be to rally support from an opposing side but specifically target the undecided and somehow sympathizers from an opposing side.For comparative politics to be considered as a natural science there must be a well defined discipline of comparative history going by the background of comparative politics that is based on history. However, there are arguments that comparative history has not been able to yield much over the years thus the fundamental question remains; how do we get comparative history to yield.In research design, "case selection process is one of the most fundamental processes that one has to undertake" (52). This is not different in comparative politics. However, there is always a range of options that one can choose to undertake depending on the number of variables and the cases involved. Case selection is very central when it comes to research design and the level of inquiry is predominantly dependent on the empirical question being analyzed. More importantly, the difference in the number of variables and the number of cases is a fundamental option when selecting cases as well as organizing data sets. There are times when the numbers of cases are few a situations that greatly affects the research design chosen. There are five options that are considered during case selections. These key factors include 1 Case study 2 Time series 3 Closed universe 4 Cross section 5 Pooled analysisThe case study method is particularly pivotal in the anal...
Wednesday, July 1, 2020
Assessment of Yeats through Three Poems - Literature Essay Samples
W.B. Yeats is considered one of the greatest Irish writers due to his eloquent, ââ¬Ëotherworldlyââ¬â¢ early poetry and many of his later dramas and works for which he received the Nobel Prize. Often associated with the Irish Literary Revival, Yeatsââ¬â¢ early work can be looked at in a postcolonial sense. The poetry utilises Irish and Celtic folklore to ââ¬Å"project a strongly Irish element, (Lit 201 Study Guide 2010) as seen through an understanding of cultural ideology. Although the majority of the themes in Yeatsââ¬â¢ poetry look pastoral and mythical, he is projecting a strong message of promoting the Irish spirit and feeling. Three poems in which the audience can observe this sense are Cuchulainââ¬â¢s Fight with the Sea, The Rose of the World, and Who Goes with Fergus, all written in 1893. The goal of Yeatsââ¬â¢ Celtic mythic poetry was to reconstruct the imaginative processes of the life led by his ancestors in Ireland. As a quote from Yeats suggests, his co untrymen had stopped following politics and instead were turning to the literary and cultural arts to revive the traditions and society of Ireland: ââ¬Å"Everywhere I saw the change taking place, young men turning away from politics altogether, taking to Gaelic, taking to Literature, or remaining in politics that they might substitute for violent speech more violent action. From that national humiliation, from the resolution to destroy all that made the humiliation possible, from that sacrificial victim, I derive all that is living in the imagination of Ireland today (ââ¬ËModern Irelandââ¬â¢)â⬠(Yeats, Lit 201 Study Guide 2010).The first poem to be examined is Cuchulainââ¬â¢s Fight with the Sea, and as the footnotes suggest, W.B. Yeats was very interested in this Celtic legendary warrior Cuchulain and wrote about him numerous times (Yeats, Lit 201 Poetry Anthology). The ancient hero Cuchulain was often considered divine because of his God-like abilities and strength. However, when these abilities allow his extreme force to take over his reason, it becomes his downfall when he kills his own son. The story begins with a swineherd being told by his mother that he is too strong to idle his life away and should go find his father. The young man goes into the camp and hears that his father is highly praised there; however, his father sees the man and not knowing him thinks he invaded the camp. Cuchulain fights his son and as he kills him, the swineherd reveals that he is actually Cuchulainââ¬â¢s son. Enraged for killing his own son, he asks the druids to chant and he fights with the sea instead of humans. This can be paralleled in a political sense to the people of Ireland telling the men to be strong and not passive about the British ruling over their land, but their fight ends in vain. The story becomes tragic and pedantic; the outcome is not what was expected. As this poem is an adaptation from a traditional Irish saga, Yeats uses poetry in thi s way to educate his people about their own history (class notes). Using the epic form is especially significant. Historically, epic poetry is associated with those of the classical tradition such as Homer; Yeats is commenting that Irish tales are just as important and timeless as those classics. He even incorporates some classical themes such as tragic heroism and the Oedipus complex in reverse. The poem also allows the author to challenge the notion that current faith in logic and reason ignored the imagination (class notes). Clearly Cuchulainââ¬â¢s Fight with the Sea allows Yeats creative genius to flourish as it pulls on major themes across politics and cultural identity. Yeats again incorporates differing themes in other early poetry such as The Rose of the World. One of the most obvious themes in this poem is the symbol of the rose as eternal beauty. Once again the reader is reminded of classics through allusions to past beauty. One example is the iconic Helen of Troy in th e Iliad: ââ¬Å"Troy passed away in one funeral gleam (21)â⬠. Yeats also brings in the Irish mythic as well; the poem can be paralleled with the Irish legend of the beautiful Deidra of sorrows. This is evident by line 5, ââ¬Å"And Usnaââ¬â¢s children died (21),â⬠referring to Deidraââ¬â¢s husband whom died for her. Yeats was always in love with a woman named Maud Gonne, whom he idolised (class notes). This piece represents the distance between them because she never loved Yeats back and he was forced to admire her from afar. It is fairly likely that he wrote this poem as a response to his unreturned love for her. Yeats also has a subliminal political message in poem that Maude represents the strife of Ireland, and that her beauty is likened to Helen of Troyââ¬â¢s; it becomes a catalyst to a war between nations. The symbol of the beautiful Rose is an excellent example of how Yeats makes a political message. He relies on Irish Mythology as a medium to express how h is writing is very separate from the writing in England. English writers would only draw on classical Greek or Roman stories, but by Yeats referencing them as well as Irish folktales his writing becomes truly distinct. The Irish audience would recognise this and it would be well received. This poem is littered with mythological allusions to portray a political message, but not as much as another popular early poem by Yeats: Who Goes with Fergus. As soon as one begins to read Who Goes with Fergus, they could infer that the poem is a subtle call to nationalism. If the reader knew the context and history out of which Yeats was writing this becomes increasingly true. The poem is also more about passive nationalism rather than the vain fighting in Cuchulainââ¬â¢s Fight with the Sea, or the idealized nationalism of The Rose of the World. Yeats is commenting that the Irish population should retreat to its roots of mysticism and legend; it is in this way they can break free of the polit ical turmoil and be allowed to live the Irish tradition. Fergus is synonymous with nature here and Yeats is posing this solution to the younger generation to turn to nature for hope. Fergus gave up his political ambitions in exchange for wisdom from the druids, and this is what Yeats urges his audience to do as well. Yeats clearly is preoccupied with the otherworldly aspects and this theme is followed throughout his poetry. Who Goes with Fergus is Yeats asking his countrymen to contemplate with him and to give up the unnecessary political battles. It is a move to pacifism, and in a simpler sense it states that wisdom is the non-confrontational choice. By placing this importance on Irish culture and folklore, Yeats could effectively fulfil his need for national pride. The very rich tradition of mythical tales and folklore in Ireland allowed Yeats to draw from many great sagas. He also referenced his own personal experiences and the underlying message of Irish nationalism. Yeats was a deeply patriotic individual, but it really is an exceptional case to look at the way he treated nationalism. Rather than a strong call to arms as many Irish nationalists wanted, he instead chose to reflect the rich culture and traditional past of Ireland. Yeats also placed a strong emphasis on the use of the imagination, and allowed his ideas to flourish; he created visions of loveliness and expressed otherworldly notions. Through his use of mythic tales and legends incorporated into his poetry, Yeats was able to capture the hearts of his homelands people, and showed them that in order to be and Irish nationalist one did not have to be violent. He looked toward creating the development of an independent national identity. Although his poetry is Irish at its essence, the themes can be universally admired and recognised, which is why Yeats continues to be one of the greatest writers of the contemporary era. Bibliography Molloy, Frank. LIT201 Poetry Anthology. Charles Sturt Universit y, 2010 Molloy, Frank. LIT201 Study Guide. Charles Sturt University, 2010
Tuesday, May 19, 2020
Pepper and Water Science Magic Trick
The pepper and water science trick is one of the easiest magic tricks you can perform. Heres how to do the trick and an explanation of how it works. Necessary Materials You only need a few common kitchen ingredients to perform this science magic trick. black pepperwaterdishwashing liquidplate or bowl Steps to Performing the Trick Pour water into a plate or bowl.Shake some pepper onto the waters surface.Dip your finger into the pepper and water (Nothing much will happen).However, if you put a drop of dishwashing liquid on your finger and then dip it into the pepper and water the pepper will rush to the outer edges of the dish. If you are doing this as a trick then you might have one finger that is clean and another finger that you dipped in detergent before performing the trick. You could use a spoon or chopstick if you dont want a soapy finger. Heres How the Trick Works When you add detergent to water the surface tension of the water is lowered. Water normally bulges up a bit, like what you see when you look at a water drop. When the ââ¬â¹surface tension is lowered, the water wants to spread out. As the water flattens on the dish, the pepper that is floating on top of the water is carried to the outer edge of the plate as if by magic. Exploring Surface Tension With Detergent What happens if you mix detergent into the water and then shake pepper onto it? The pepper sinks to the bottom of the plate because the surface tension of the water is too low to hold up the particles. The high surface tension of water is why spiders and some insects can walk on water. If you added a drop of detergent to the water, they would sink, too. Floating Needle Trick A related science-based trick is the floating needle trick. You can float a needle (or paperclip) on water because the surface tension is high enough to hold it up. If the needle gets completely wet, it will sink immediately. Running the needle across your skin first will coat it with a thin layer of oil, helping it to float. Another option is to set the needle on a floating bit of tissue paper. The paper will become hydrated and sink, leaving a floating needle. Touching the water with a finger dipped in detergent will cause the metal to sink. Quarters in a Glass of Water Another way to demonstrate the high surface tension of water is to see how many quarters or other coins you can add to a full glass of water before it overflows. As you add coins, the surface of the water will become convexà before finally overflowing. How many coins can you add? This depends on how you add them. Slowly sliding the coins into the water edge-on will improve your results. If youre competing with a friend, you can sabotage his efforts by coating his coins with soap.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)